Monday, 1 April 2013

The effect of travel on language learning - why schools have it wrong

Following a delightful holiday through South-East Asia, I’ve returned with a renewed vigour and appetite for my studies. “Travel broadens the mind” – one of life’s great truth’s and personal mantras. Yet one of the first articles that really caught my attention illustrated the struggle Government and schools face in ensuring Asian second language learning flourishes in the wake of the Asian Century white paper. 

 ''There are actually fewer classroom learners of Chinese who don't speak Chinese at home taking Chinese at senior levels than there were four years ago,''

In-country enrichment programs are, from a personal perspective, an immensely rewarding initiative, yet the costs can be exorbitant. To keep students pursuing Asian language studies at a secondary school level, enrichment programs should not only be commonplace, but subsidised by the Government. Students need to be made aware of the benefits gained from living a country, experiencing every nuance and minutia not available in Australian classrooms. Too much emphasis is placed on grades, not skill acquisition. Ultimately, as clichéd as it sounds, language learning is a journey, not a destination. Some schools implementing language programs think they’re broadening their students mind, yet rote learning only serves to expand the mind’s ability to retain characters, tones and terms, to be regurgitated at a later, more convenient date.
I was fortunate enough to be interviewed for the Melbourne Graduate School of Education’s 2012 report ‘Good learners of Chinese – profiles of secondary students.’ For someone passionate about language learning, travel and internationalism, the findings are incredibly frustrating. 

"The picture that emerges of the experience of studying Chinese is a rather dismal one."

"Lessons are dull and repetitive."

"There is a considerable imbalance in emphasis on development in literacy at the expense of spoken skills"

At a school level, there is much to learn for teachers and students alike. Stale, uninspiring teaching practices won’t result in the uptake of language learning, nor will it ensure students view the process as a journey, rather than a destination, whereupon they receive their final marks and that’s the end of it. Instead of having pictures of The Great Wall engaging only student’s eyes in the classroom, have students experience it for themselves. Contrary to the belief of some, language learning is a multi-sensory experience. I count myself as one of the luckiest in the world to have lived such wonderful moments in a multitude of Asian nations. I only hope students are provided the opportunity to implement sensory, vivid learning practices in Asian environments. To achieve inspiration is to avoid destination-thinking. I’d hope broadening the mind involves filling it with experiences of the richest quality, not school determined objectives students slavishly work to achieve.